Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Democrat Mark Herring stressed his differences with Republican Mark Obenshain during a recent debate between the attorney general candidates.
But Herring said Obenshain was right on one point -- a charge that Herring had switched his stance on gay marriage. We rolled out the Flip-O-Meter to examine the extent of Herring’s change. Let’s journey back in time.
In 2003, Herring unsuccessfully ran for the state Senate. He said marriage should be between a man and a woman, according to an Oct. 17 article that year in The Winchester Star.
On Feb. 2, 2006, Herring was sworn in as a state senator after winning a special election in Loudoun County. Fifteen days later, he supported a resolution allowing Virginia voters to decide whether there should be a state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Virginia law already defined marriage as between a man and a woman. But many referendum backers said the added constitutional amendment would shield the traditional marriage law from judicial tampering.
Herring reiterated his support for the amendment during a Sept. 20, 2006, interview with Leesburg Today, saying it was consistent with Virginia’s existing marriage law. In November, the amendment was approved by 57 percent of voters.
Herring sang a different tune this spring during his successful Democratic primary campaign for attorney general.
On April 5, he released an "Equality Agenda" that said, "Mark Herring believes that civil marriage is a fundamental right, and he supports marriage equality for same-gender couples." Herring pledged to work "to change the current law prohibiting such marriages."
Obenshain, a state senator from Harrisonburg since 2004, has been outspoken in his opposition to gay marriage. During a debate this June 15 with Herring, Obenshain said, "I believe marriage is an institution to be entered into between a man and a woman. That’s an issue upon which Mark and I, until at least a few years ago, agreed."
Herring acknowledged that "almost eight years ago" he "didn’t really feel comfortable" about gay marriage.
"But since that time, I’ve done a lot of thinking about it," he said. "I’ve talked to my friends, my constituents. I talked to co-workers; I talked to my family, including my children. And like millions of Americans and a lot of Virginians, I don’t believe that way anymore and I think it’s wrong.
"I don’t believe anybody should be treated as a second-class citizen and I don’t believe that the state should decide who you can and cannot marry. So I support marriage equality and as we work towards marriage equality, there are very specific things I, as attorney general, can do to help protect the rights of gay and lesbian Virginians."
For better or worse, Herring has done a Full Flop.
Herring-Obenshain debate, June 15, 2013.
Legislative Information Service, HJ 41, Feb. 17, 2006.
Washington Blade, Herring unveils LGBT agenda, April 5, 2013.
Mark Herring for Attorney General, An equality agenda, April 5, 2013.
The Winchester Star, Potts-Herring debate story, Oct. 7, 2003.
Leesburg Today, "Black challenges Democrats to marriage amendment debate," Sept. 20, 2006.
Virginia Board of Elections, Senate district 27 results, Nov. 4, 2003.
Virginia Board of Elections, Special election results, Jan. 31, 2006.
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.