Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Republicans have made it clear they're opposed to the nomination of Dawn Johnsen to head the White House Office of Legal Counsel. They're unhappy with her support of abortion rights, but a recent blog posting made a surprising allegation: That she said motherhood was "involuntary servitude."
We wondered if she was really was so impolitic as to attack motherhood. And if so, does she have it in for apple pie as well?
The allegation came from the Web site of the House Republican Conference:
"At least 45 House Republicans have co-signed a letter to President Barack Obama in opposition to his nomination of Dawn Johnson [sic] for the head of the Office of Legal Counsel," the site says in a blog post . The post continued: "Her brazen pro-abortion stances [include] a Supreme Court amicus brief where she called motherhood 'involuntary servitude.'"
The Republicans are referring to a 1989 brief in Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services, a case that tested whether states could prohibit abortions in public health institutions. Johnsen was then legal director of the National Abortion Rights Action League, one of 77 organizations to sign the brief.
Footnote 23, part of the brief that Johnsen said in a Senate hearing that she wrote, said the following: "While a woman might choose to bear children gladly and voluntarily, statutes that curtail her abortion choice are disturbingly suggestive of involuntary servitude, prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment, in that forced pregnancy requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state's asserted interest. Indeed, the actual process of delivery demands work of the most intense and physical kind: labor of 12 or more grueling hours of contractions is not uncommon."
So Johnsen compared "forced pregnancy" — not motherhood — to involuntary servitude.
After we asked the Republican Conference about the claim, staffer Ericka Andersen acknowledged it was wrong. "You are correct that the post was written inaccurately," she told us in an e-mail. She corrected the post to say Johnsen "equated forced pregnancy with 'involuntary servitude.'"
Kudos to the conference for acknowledging the error. But we still find the original claim False.
GOP.gov, ConferenceBlog, Republicans Request Obama Take Back Nomination of Dawn Johnson [sic], March 23, 2009, accessed March 24, 2009
Federal News Service, Hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Feb. 25, 2009
Supreme Court of the United States, William L. Webster, et al., vs. Reproductive Health Services, et al., Brief of Seventy-Seven Organizations Committed to Women's Equality as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees, March 30, 1989
Congressional Quarterly Weekly, Confirmation Update, March 21, 2009
New York Times, Justice Dept. Nominee Avoids Confrontation at Hearing , Feb. 26, 2009, accessed March 24, 2009
New York Times, Backers Push Louisiana Abortion Bill Toward Supreme Court Test , June 24, 1990, accessed March 24, 2009
National Review Online, The Corner, I have "shocked" OLC nominee Dawn Johnsen , Feb. 26, 2009, accessed March 24, 2009
National Review Online, Lawyer's Lawyer, Radical's Radical , March 9, 2009, accessed March 24, 2009
E-mail exchange with Ericka Andersen, spokeswoman for the House Republican Conference, March 24, 2009
Read About Our Process
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.