Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
In Montana Senate race, Tim Sheehy airs inaccurate illegal immigration attack on Jon Tester
If Your Time is short
-
In 2013, during a "vote-a-rama," when lawmakers from both parties often introduce amendments intended to force votes on policies that could be controversial with constituents, Senate Republicans forced Democrats to vote on a budget bill amendment to prohibit immigrants illegally in the country from qualifying for federally subsidized health care.
-
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., voted against the amendment, But its passage would not have given "taxpayer-funded health care to illegal immigrants." Such spending was then, and is now, prohibited under federal law, and changing that would have required passing separate legislation.
Montana Republican Tim Sheehy is attacking his U.S. Senate race opponent, Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., over illegal immigration, echoing claims that other Republicans have used against incumbent Democrats this year.
A September ad that was jointly sponsored by Sheehy and the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Senate Republicans’ campaign arm, includes a video clip of Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, saying, "Yeah, I am radical," then tries to tie Tester to her.
One position the ad says Tester shares with Harris is that "Jon Tester voted to give taxpayer-funded health care to illegal immigrants." (We previously rated the claim that Harris "endorsed free taxpayer-funded government health care for all illegal aliens" Mostly False.)
The ad’s claim refers to a vote Tester cast in 2013, but it exaggerates the vote’s effect.
Screenshot
Sheehy’s campaign confirmed that the ad’s assertion was based on the 2013 vote.
On March 23, 2013, Tester voted to reject a budget bill amendment from then-Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., that would have established "a deficit-reduction reserve fund to achieve savings by prohibiting illegal immigrants or illegal immigrants granted legal status from qualifying for federally subsidized health care." The Republican amendment failed, mostly along party lines, 43-56.
The amendment was part of what is called a "vote-a-rama," a lengthy series of votes on amendments during the budget process.
The Senate limits debate on budget measures to 50 hours but does not set a time limit for considering amendments. Lawmakers from both parties often introduce amendments structured to force members of the other party to support or oppose policies that could be controversial with constituents.
Typically, "political messaging, not real policy change, is the immediate purpose," said Steven Smith, a Senate specialist and political science professor emeritus at Washington University in St. Louis.
Featured Fact-check
In Sessions’ amendment, the "deficit-reduction reserve fund" nods to the requirement that amendments address the federal budget. But the amendment was aimed at getting Democrats to vote against barring immigrants in the U.S. illegally from participating in federally subsidized health programs.
Smith said the Sessions amendment would have had "no policy effect." Even if it had passed, the federal government already had laws preventing spending on health coverage, such as Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, for migrants in the U.S. illegally, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Migrants in the U.S. illegally also cannot purchase subsidized health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance portal. (Some emergency services can trigger federal reimbursement to health care providers under a separate law, the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act, but that does not constitute continuing health insurance coverage.)
"Other legislation would have to be enacted into law for (the amendment) to have any potential meaning," Smith told PolitiFact.
During a budget "vote-a-rama," legislation could not be offered to change the underlying policy, because of how the chamber’s rules are structured.
An ad from Sheehy said Tester "voted to give taxpayer-funded health care to illegal immigrants."
In 2013, during a series of budget bill amendments, Tester and other Democrats voted against a Republican-sponsored amendment that would have prohibited immigrants illegally in the country from qualifying for federally subsidized health care.
But its passage would not have given "taxpayer-funded health care to illegal immigrants." Federal law already prohibited such spending and changing that would have required passing separate legislation.
We rate the statement False.
PolitiFact Staff Writer Seth Richardson contributed to this report.
Our Sources
Tim Sheehy and the National Republican Senatorial Committee, ad, Sept. 27, 2024
Congress.gov, S. Amdt. 614 to S.Con.Res.8, accessed Sept. 28, 2024
Roll call vote on Sessions Amendment No. 614, March 23, 2013
KFF, "State Health Coverage for Immigrants and Implications for Health Coverage and Care," May 1, 2024
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Emergency Health Services for Undocumented Aliens," accessed Sept. 28, 2024
Fox News, "Vulnerable Dem senator breaks silence on Biden admin providing veteran medical resources to illegal immigrants," Feb. 19, 2024
CNN, "Here’s what a ‘vote-a-rama’ is (and what it means for Democrats’ energy and health care bill)," Aug. 4, 2022
PolitiFact, "Bernie Moreno misleads on Sherrod Brown votes for federal aid for migrants with nonlegal status," Sept. 4, 2024
Email interviews with Steven Smith, political science professor emeritus and former Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government and Public Policy, Washington University in St. Louis, Aug. 29 and Sept. 28, 2024
Statement from the Jon Tester campaign, Sept. 28, 2024
Browse the Truth-O-Meter
More by Louis Jacobson
In Montana Senate race, Tim Sheehy airs inaccurate illegal immigration attack on Jon Tester
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.