Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Marco Rubio speaks during the Republican presidential debate in Boulder, Colo., on Oct. 28, 2015. (Jim Wilson/New York Times) Marco Rubio speaks during the Republican presidential debate in Boulder, Colo., on Oct. 28, 2015. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)

Marco Rubio speaks during the Republican presidential debate in Boulder, Colo., on Oct. 28, 2015. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)

Amy Sherman
By Amy Sherman November 4, 2015
By Clayton Youngman November 4, 2015

Marco Rubio said there was never evidence that the attacks on Benghazi were spontaneous

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio portrayed Hillary Clinton as lying about the circumstances of the Benghazi attack when she said the attacks were the result of an anti-Muslim video instead of al-Qaida-like terrorists.

"There was not a single person on the ground in Benghazi who believed that it was a spontaneous uprising," he said in an interview on CNN on Oct. 29, 2015.

CNN’s Chris Cuomo asked Rubio how it could be a lie if the CIA told Clinton it was due to a demonstration.

Rubio replied: "She consistently, privately told people, over and over again, including in the early aftermath of it, that this was led by al-Qaida-like elements. There was never a single shred of evidence presented to anyone that this was spontaneous, and in fact, the CIA themselves understood that early on, irrespective of what the administration is telling you now."

We wanted to fact-check what Rubio said about what the CIA understood, drawing on the seven congressional investigations that followed, as well as news articles provided by Rubio and testimony by officials that the Clinton campaign sent us.

What we found is a very murky situation. It seems like there were indications early on that the attacks were not the result of simple protests. But also early on, some in the government did seem to think that demonstrations over the video were a factor. That constitutes something of a "shred," contrary to what Rubio said.

Timeline of reports about what prompted the attacks

To try to sort out the evidence, we created a timeline to show when information was shared about the reason for the attacks. (Other media have created their own timelines, including and the Washington Post’s The Fact Checker.)

Sept. 11, 2012: The attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound begins at 3:40 p.m. ET (9:40 p.m. in Benghazi); an attack on a CIA mission annex begins at 6 p.m. ET. Four Americans die in the attacks.

Sept. 11, 2012: Defense Secretary Leon Panetta met with Defense Department officials a couple hours after the attack "to discuss the Benghazi attack and other violence in the region in reaction to the anti-Muslim video," according to a report from the bipartisan Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Several officials later told this committee that they believed it was a terrorist attack immediately or almost immediately.

Sept. 11, 2012: Clinton issued a statement that didn’t indicate a cause for the attack but said, "Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet." At 11:12 p.m. Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea saying the attack was conducted by an al-Qaida like group.

Another email revealed that Clinton, during a phone call with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf around 8 p.m. ET, said she understood Ansar al-Sharia, an al-Qaida-affiliated group, claimed responsibility for the attacks.

However, 24 hours after taking responsibility for the attacks, Ansar al-Sharia retracted the claim.

Sept. 11, 2012: Two alerts were issued by the State Department Operations Center to administration officials, according to the House Republican Conference report. The first said the U.S. facilities were under attack, while the second linked the attacks to Ansar al-Sharia. Neither alert mentioned a protest related to the video.

Sept. 12, 2012: In the first CIA assessment of the attacks, the CIA said "the presence of armed assailants from the incident’s outset suggests this was an intentional assault and not the escalation of a peaceful protest."

According to the bipartisan House Intelligence Committee report, the CIA later said the initial assessment lacked supporting evidence and was subsequently left out of reports. Meanwhile, analysts "received 21 reports that a protest occurred in Benghazi." Fourteen of those reports were issued from the Open Source Center (a CIA intelligence center), while the rest came from the CIA, the Defense Department and the NSA.

However, the bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found issues with the reports because they included information from early news reports, not just original intelligence. The reports were also based on intercepted communications and informants’ tips, according to the New York Times.  

Sept, 12, 2012: President Barack Obama, speaking in the Rose Garden, said, "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation." While he didn’t refer to the video directly, Obama did say, "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."

Sept. 15, 2012: The CIA’s chief of station in Tripoli wrote an email to the then-deputy director of the CIA saying that the attacks were "not an escalation of protests."

The intelligence community "also had information that there were no protests outside the Temporary Mission Facility prior to the attacks, but did not incorporate that information into its widely circulated assessments in a timely manner," according to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report.

Featured Fact-check

Sept. 16, 2012: United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on five Sunday talk shows. She talked about the video several times and said, "We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned."

She said on NBC’s Meet the Press that the current assessment was the attack was "a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo -- almost a copycat of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video."

The administration was later criticized for the talking points fed to Rice in advance of her interviews. In an email from Ben Rhodes, the then-deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, one of those talking points stated: "Since we began to see protests in response to this Internet video, the president has directed the administration to take a number of steps."

Sept. 18, 2012: The CIA and FBI reviewed video footage from the Benghazi compound that showed no protests preceding the attack.

Sept. 19, 2012: Director of National Intelligence Matt Olsen said during a congressional hearing that the State Department officials in Benghazi died "in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy."

Sept. 20, 2012: Clinton said during a press conference that "the video that sparked these protests is disgusting and reprehensible, and the United States government, of course, had absolutely nothing to do with it."

Sept. 21, 2012: Clinton attributed the attack to terrorism during a press conference: "What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans."

Sept. 24, 2012: The CIA changed its assessment of the attacks after determining that no protests occurred outside the Benghazi facility before the attacks.

Sept. 28, 2012: Shawn Turner, a spokesperson for the Director of National Intelligence, issued a statement that officials initially thought that the attack was spontaneous but soon concluded that terrorists were involved:

"In the immediate aftermath, there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. We provided that initial assessment to Executive Branch officials and members of Congress, who used that information to discuss the attack publicly and provide updates as they became available. ... As we learned more about the attack, we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

Rubio campaign evidence

As for whether there was never "a single shred of evidence" presented that the attack was spontaneous despite what Clinton said, a spokeswoman for Rubio pointed to news articles in conservative media about what Clinton and the former acting CIA director Michael Morell said about the attacks.

For example, in an Oct. 23, 2015, Fox News report, Charles Woods, father of Ty Woods, who died in the Benghazi attack, shared diary notes he took after meeting Clinton on Sept. 14, 2012. The two spoke at a ceremony when the victims’ bodies were flown back to the United States.

"I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand. And she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son," the entry said.

In Morell’s 2015 book The Great War of Our Time, Morell wrote, "Still others might have been motivated by the video -- although I should note our analysts never said the video was a factor in the Benghazi attacks."

Clinton campaign evidence

Clinton’s campaign also pointed to statements made by government officials who described initial confusion.

"I think that the first week after 9/11, there was significant uncertainty about what had happened and disagreement among key people who shaped opinion," State Department Office Director for Maghreb Affairs William Roebuck told the Democratic Staff Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in August 2013.

Adding to the confusion was that the Benghazi attack occurred around the same time as protests over the anti-Muslim video in Cairo.

"There was some confusion about have you had -- was this the same thing, were these two incidents the same, were they different?" Roebuck said. "The interagency was trying to sort that out. They were also trying to sort out the conflicting information from Benghazi itself. ... Like I said, there was a dispute among people who were looking very carefully at all of the evidence on the ground, and there was a legitimate disagreement about what had sort of been the precursor to the attack."

Our ruling

Rubio said on CNN, "There was never a single shred of evidence presented to anyone that this was spontaneous, and in fact, the CIA themselves understood that early on."

There was some initial confusion about what sparked the Sept. 11, 2012, attack. Although investigations showed that some officials thought it was a terrorist attack immediately, there at least appeared to be some question about whether the video could have played a role.

Rubio exaggerates when he said there wasn’t a "single shred of evidence." There were several suggestions that it was because of a protest. However, he has a point that much of the early evidence pointed strongly to terrorism. Overall, we rate his statement Half True.

Our Sources

CNN, Interview with Sen. Marco Rubio, Oct. 29, 2015

CBS, Interview with Sen. Marco Rubio, (Accessed in Nexis) Oct. 29, 2015

Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Statement by spokesman Shawn Turner about Benghazi attack, Sept. 28, 2015

National Security Network, "Getting the Facts on Benghazi," Accessed Nov. 2, 2015

Washington Post’s The Fact Checker, "Is Hillary Clinton a liar on Benghazi?" Oct. 30, 2015, "Benghazi timeline," Oct. 26, 2012

Washington Post’s The Fact Checker, "From video to terrorist attack: a definitive timeline of administration statements on the Libya attack," Sept. 27, 2012

White House, "Remarks by the president on the deaths of U.S. embassy staff in Libya," Sept. 12, 2012

U.S. State Department, Accountability Review Board report, Dec. 19. 2012

U.S. State Department, "Statement on the attack in Benghazi," Sept. 11, 2012

U.S. State Department, "Remarks With Indonesian Foreign Minister Raden Mohammad Marty Muliana Natalegawa After Their Meeting," Sept. 20, 2012

U.S. State Department, "Remarks With Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar Before Their Meeting," Sept. 21, 2012

U.S. State Department, Goals and Toplines about Benghazi, April 17, 2014

CBS News, "Benghazi timeline: how the probe unfolded"

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, "Benghazi Attacks: Investigative Update, Interim Report on the Accountability Review Board," Sept. 16, 2013

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "Senators Lieberman, Collins Release Report on Benghazi Security Considerations," Dec. 31, 2012

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "Homeland Threats and Agency Responses,Hearing before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs: The Homeland Threat Landscape and U.S. Response," Sept. 19, 2012

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "Flashing Red: A Special Report On The Terrorist Attack At Benghazi," Dec. 30, 2012

U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, "Senate Intelligence Committee Releases Declassified Bipartisan Report on Benghazi Terrorist Attacks," Jan. 15, 2014

U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, "Flashing Red: A Special Report on the Terrorist Attack at Benghazi," Dec. 30, 2012

The Washington Post, "Senate report: Attacks on U.S. compounds in Benghazi could have been prevented," Jan. 15, 2014

The Washington Post, "The 8 memorable moments from Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi testimony," Jan. 23, 2013

The New York Times, "After Benghazi Attack, Talk Lagged Behind Intelligence," Oct. 21, 2012

CBS News, "Hillary Clinton on Benghazi: ‘I do feel responsible’," Jan. 23, 2013

House Committee on Foreign Affairs, "Benghazi: Where is the State Department Accountability?" February 2014

USA TODAY, "House Benghazi report raps State on accountability," Feb. 7, 2014

Wall Street Journal’s Wash Wire blog, "Hillary Clinton’s email to Chelsea stars in Benghazi hearing," Oct.  22, 2015

U.S. House of Representatives, "Interim Progress Report for the Members of the House Republican Conference on the Events Surrounding the September 11, 2012 Terrorist Attacks in Benghazi, Libya," April 23, 2013

CBS News, "House GOP faults Clinton, State Dept for Benghazi security," April 24, 2013

House Committee on Armed Services, "Majority Interim Report: Benghazi Investigation Update," February 2014

USA TODAY, "Armed Services Committee slams White House on Benghazi," Feb. 11, 2014

The Associated Press, "House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories," Nov. 21, 2014

The Washington Post, "House votes to form special committee to investigate Benghazi attacks," May 8, 2014

Bloomberg, "Awaiting Hillary Clinton, House Benghazi Committee Claims Year of Progress," May 8, 2015

POLITICO, "Clinton will testify before Benghazi panel on Oct. 22," July 29, 2015

The Wall Street Journal, "She Knew All Along," Oct. 23, 2015

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, "Investigative Report on the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya, September 11-12, 2012," Nov. 21, 2014

The Daily Caller, "Former CIA chief: analysts never said the video was a factor in Benghazi attacks," Oct. 31, 2015

Fox News, "Diary entry from Benghazi victim’s dad: "I gave Hillary a hug, she blamed filmmaker," Oct. 23, 2015

Michael Morell, "The Great War of Our Time," 2015

Judicial Watch, FOIA requests for State Department emails

PolitiFact, "Fact-checking Benghazi: The rhetoric hasn't matched up with reality," May 16, 2014

PolitiFact, "Clinton: 7 Benghazi probes so far," Oct. 12, 2015

PolitiFact, "Jay Carney says Susan Rice didn’t play down terrorist involvement in Benghazi," May 13, 2013

PolitiFact, "Romney says Obama waited 14 days to call Libya attack terror," Oct. 17, 2012

PunditFact, "O’Reilly denies accusing WH of political motives in early Benghazi response," Feb. 4, 2014

Interview, Josh Schwerin, Hillary Clinton campaign spokesman, Nov.  2, 2015

Interview, Brooke Sammon, Sen. Marco Rubio campaign spokeswoman, Nov. 2, 2015


Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Amy Sherman

Marco Rubio said there was never evidence that the attacks on Benghazi were spontaneous

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up