Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

The Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. (Wikimedia commons) The Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. (Wikimedia commons)

The Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. (Wikimedia commons)

Louis Jacobson
By Louis Jacobson April 12, 2023

If Your Time is short

• Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis raised the specter of the U.S. government tracking ordinary Americans’ purchases and even blocking transactions of which it disapproves.

• Even if federal leaders decided they wanted to block Americans’ everyday purchases this way — and there’s no indication they do — the laws currently on the books would not allow it. And Americans’ preferences for privacy would make it difficult to change the laws to make it possible.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., recently raised the specter of the U.S. government tracking ordinary Americans’ purchases — and even blocking transactions of which it disapproves.

Decrying what he called "woke banking," DeSantis told the conservative Pennsylvania Leadership Conference that he would make sure Floridians "are not discriminated against" because they "own guns or they’re Christians or they’re conservative." He continued:

"One of the things we’re gonna ban in Florida this year is the idea of a central bank digital currency that they’re trying to do. This is something where they want the (Federal Reserve) to control a digital dollar. And guess what’ll happen? They’re gonna try to impose an (environmental, social and governance) agenda through that. 

"You go and use too much gas, they’re gonna stop it. They’re not going to honor the transaction because you’ve already bought more than what they think. You wanna go buy a rifle, they’re gonna say no, you have too many of those, you can’t do it."

DeSantis’ remarks on April 1 reiterated his stance against businesses adopting policies of diversity, environmental stewardship and other social goals. 

His comments echoed other concerns raised online, mainly by conservatives, about the supposed risks of centralized digital banking. These have frequently been debunked or shown to be exaggerated.

Are we on the verge of a central bank digital currency that would allow the Federal Reserve "to control a digital dollar," as DeSantis said? Multiple experts dismissed the notion. Even if it were technically feasible, current U.S. laws would not permit the kinds of monetary surveillance and control that DeSantis described.

The Federal Reserve is studying the possibility of creating a digital currency, which DeSantis’ press secretary, Bryan Griffin, told PolitiFact "leaves plenty of room for concern."

"Centralized currency provides an avenue for the controlling entity to push an agenda," Griffin said, pointing to moves by China’s government to increase surveillance of its citizens through the use of centralized digital currency.

However, when we checked with banking experts, we found broad agreement that DeSantis’ remarks overstate the likelihood that such a system is possible, much less likely, to emerge in the United States — for a variety of technical, legal and political reasons.

"DeSantis’ comments are nonsense backed by rhetoric," said Aaron Klein, a senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.

FedNow vs. central bank digital currency

Part of the confusion stems from a misunderstanding of two distinct and separate initiatives by the Federal Reserve, both of which have inspired critical commentary online.

One effort, called FedNow, is an instant payment infrastructure that will let businesses and people send and receive payments "in real time, around the clock, every day of the year."

FedNow, which has been in development for years, is not a replacement for physical currency. Rather, it would replace other existing online payment systems, such as the widely used ACH system, which is used for payments such as paychecks and tax refunds and that the Federal Reserve helps operate

FedNow would be comparable to private-sector online payment systems such as Venmo or Zelle, and its use would be optional for banks. The benefit, supporters say, is it would be faster and more efficient than existing systems. 

FedNow is slated to begin operating later this year

The second effort the Fed is working on — the possible creation of a central bank digital currency — is not as close to fruition and, in fact, may never happen. And unlike FedNow, it would be akin to physical currency.

The Federal Reserve Board website notes that Americans already hold money predominantly in digital form, such as in bank accounts and payment apps. A central bank digital currency would be different from that, because the value would be held by the Federal Reserve, rather than a commercial bank. Cash or paper currency would not be phased out and would coexist with a central bank digital currency. 

In March 2022, President Joe Biden issued an executive order directing a feasibility study for a potential central bank digital currency. 

Could a central bank digital currency prohibit certain purchases?

Six banking experts we contacted agreed that DeSantis’ vision of central bank digital currency, in which individuals’ spending is controlled by the government, is extremely unlikely. His speculation is "demagogic nonsense," said Michael P. Malloy, a University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law professor.

The first issue is whether a digital currency system could be designed with the surveillance capabilities that DeSantis mentions. Experts said such surveillance may be technically possible, but in practice, it would not be compatible with current laws and political realities.

"There is no single definitive form" of central bank digital currency, said Hilary J. Allen, an American University law professor. How the system ultimately looks and operates, including the degree of anonymity and government access to data, would reflect a country’s "technological infrastructure, the structure of its existing banking industry, and public attitudes towards privacy, among other things," she said.

Meanwhile, even if it is technologically possible, Allen said, "technology does not operate in a vacuum" and systems can only achieve specific goals "if the relevant social and legal institutions permitted such use."

Right now, U.S. laws do not permit the kinds of surveillance and control that DeSantis describes, said Gary Richardson, a professor of economics at the University of California-Irvine. "It does not allow the central bank to take actions like this," he said. 

Currently, the Fed is empowered and structured to deal directly with banks, rather than with individual members of the public. "It is likely that amendments to the Federal Reserve Act would be necessary before a central bank digital currency could even be issued," said Ryan Clements, a University of Calgary assistant professor of business law and regulation. 

Clements said policy papers by the Fed and Congressional Research Service have acknowledged the myriad of legal uncertainties, design considerations and other complexities. This makes concerns such as DeSantis’ "premature," he said.

On March 8, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell testified to the House Financial Services Committee that the Fed could not launch such a currency without a new law.

It also appears to be technically possible to structure a central bank digital currency system in ways that minimize the possibility of government snooping, Bloomberg Law reported. In a joint project, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston built a theoretical digital currency that demonstrated the ability to process transactions without centralized storage of individual identities and balances.

Is there a desire to surveil and block customer purchases?

In part because of the backlash from DeSantis and others, it’s not clear the idea will move forward.

"It is not even certain that the Federal Reserve will pursue a central bank digital currency at all, let alone with these kinds of powers," Allen said.

Powell testified in March that "we haven’t decided that this is something that the financial system in the country would want or need, so that’s going to be very important." 

Even if the Fed decided to create a digital currency system, it would take "a significant amount of time" and "will invariably need legislative solutions and congressional authority to be established before the question of discriminatory programmability even enters the conversation," Clements said.

Despite DeSantis’ comments linking the central bank digital currency to an environmental, social and governance agenda, there is no indication that those social movements are advocating that the federal government take the step of surveilling and blocking individual purchases. 

"It is a specter created to scare the uninformed," said Richardson.

Staff writer Loreben Tuquero contributed to this report.

Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter

Our Sources

C-SPAN, "Gov. Ron DeSantis Speaks at Pennsylvania Leadership Conference," April 1, 2023

Ron DeSantis, "Gov. DeSantis’ Proposal to End ESG Woke Banking"

Governor of Florida, "Governor Ron DeSantis Announces Legislation to Protect Floridians from a Federally Controlled Central Bank Digital Currency and Surveillance State," March 20, 2023

Ron DeSantis, tweet, April 10, 2023

Florida Politics, "Ron DeSantis blames Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse on DEI," March 13, 2023

WUSF, "'Woke banking' policies targeted in legislation proposed by DeSantis," Feb. 14, 2023

Federal Reserve Board, "About the FedNow Service," accessed April 11, 2023

Federal Reserve Board, "Federal Reserve announces July launch for the FedNow Service," March 15, 2023

Federal Reserve Board, "Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): Frequently Asked Questions," accessed April 11, 2023

Federal Reserve Board, "Preconditions for a general-purpose central bank digital currency," Feb. 24, 2021

Federal Reserve Board, tweet, April 7, 2023

White House, "Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets," March 9, 2022

House Financial Services Committee, "The Federal Reserve’s Semi-Annual Monetary Policy Report" (hearing), March 8, 2023

Congressional Research Service, "Central Bank Digital Currencies: Policy Issues," Feb. 7, 2022

Financial Times, "Virtual control: the agenda behind China’s new digital currency," Feb. 16, 2021

Catherine Rampell, "No, Ron DeSantis, the Federal Reserve is not coming for your guns" (Washington Post column), April 6, 2023 

Cato Institute, "Central Bank Digital Currency: Assessing the Risks and Dispelling the Myths," April 4, 2023

Bloomberg Law, "Digital Dollar Development Stirs Transaction-Tracking Tensions," April 3, 2023

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, "Project Hamilton Phase 1 Executive Summary," Feb. 3, 2022

Atlantic Council, "Central Bank Digital Currency Tracker," accessed April 11, 2023

Verify, "No, FedNow does not create a central bank digital currency," April 7, 2023

Verify, "No, Biden executive order won’t replace paper money with digital currency," Sept. 2, 2022

USA Today, "FedNow makes payments faster, does not replace dollar or create digital currency," April 7, 2023

USA Today, Fact check: Biden's executive order will evaluate concept of a digital currency, not launch it, Sept. 20, 2022

PolitiFact, "DeSantis and RFK Jr. misconstrue Fed’s digital plans in warning of government overreach," April 7, 2023

PolitiFact, "Was Silicon Valley Bank demise caused by Trump easing regulation, 'woke' efforts, or something else?," March 13, 2023

PolitiFact, "Executive Order 14067 does not allow the federal government to electronically control money," Sept. 8, 2022

PolitiFact, "No, the FedNow Service is not replacing cash. It’s an instant payment system," April 4, 2023

PolitiFact, "No, a credit card measuring people's carbon footprint isn't part of a government plot," March 31, 2023

PolitiFact, "No, banks are not being forced to hand over physical currency to the government," Sept. 19, 2022

PolitiFact, "Biden nominee explores idea of eliminating private accounts, does not demand it," Nov. 19, 2021

Email interview with Aaron Klein, senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution, April 10, 2023

Email interview with Gary Richardson, professor of economics at the University of California-Irvine, April 10, 2023

Email interview with Ryan Clements, assistant professor of business law and regulation at the University of Calgary, April 10, 2023

Email interview with Lawrence G. Baxter. Duke University law professor, April 10, 2023

Email interview with Hilary J. Allen, American University law professor, April 10, 2023

Email interview with Michael P. Malloy, professor at the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law, April 12, 2023

Email interview with Bryan Griffin, press secretary for Ron DeSantis, April 10, 2023

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Louis Jacobson

Ron DeSantis’ baseless theory that the government wants to control people’s purchases