Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
No, Tanya Chutkan is not only D.C. judge to give harsher Jan. 6 sentences than government requested
If Your Time is short
-
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan will oversee the case brought against former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. She was randomly assigned to the case.
-
Sentencing data shows that Chutkan has been more likely to give harsher sentences to Jan. 6 defendants than other judges who have overseen these cases. But Chutkan is not the only federal judge who has issued sentences harsher than prosecutors requested for Jan. 6 defendants.
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan was randomly assigned to oversee former President Donald Trump’s third indictment case, related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
But Chutkan already is a veteran of cases involving the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol siege.
Some of Chutkan’s sentences for Jan. 6 defendants were the subject of news coverage long before Trump’s most recent indictment — a fact the former president’s supporters quickly seized on.
"The Trump case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, according to the court docket," conservative activist Jack Posobiec wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is the only federal judge in Washington, D.C., who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested."
The Trump case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, according to the court docket. Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is the only federal judge in Washington, D.C., who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested.
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 1, 2023
Although Chutkan has exceeded prosecutors’ sentencing requests more frequently than other judges overseeing Jan. 6 cases, Posobiec’s claim that she is alone in this practice is inaccurate. We found several other examples.
Chutkan, who was appointed to the bench in 2014 by President Barack Obama, was assigned to oversee Trump’s case by random draw, following court procedures, The Washington Post reported. It’s not her first encounter with Trump; Chutkan previously ruled against him in a separate case with Jan. 6 ties. In 2021, she ruled that Trump White House records were not protected by executive privilege and could be turned over to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.
We reached out to Posobiec for comment, but did not hear back before publication.
Chutkan has been more likely to give harsher sentences to Jan. 6 defendants than her peers, data shows.
As of February 2023, "there have only been six cases in which judges sentenced defendants to prison time even if prosecutors had not sought it," NPR reported. "Chutkan, who has given time behind bars in every Jan. 6 case she’s heard, was the judge in four of those cases."
In one instance, Chutkan sentenced Matthew Mazzocco, a Texas man who pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing in the Capitol, to 45 days incarceration, 60 hours of community service and $500 restitution. Prosecutors had recommended he be sentenced to 3 months home detention, 36 months probation, 60 hours of community service and $500 restitution.
"If Mr. Mazzocco walks away with probation and a slap on the wrist, that's not going to deter anyone from trying what he did again," Chutkan said at Mazzocco’s sentencing hearing. "It does not, in this Court's opinion, indicate the severity, the gravity, of the offenses that he committed on January 6."
She has issued sentences in at least 37 cases, according to a Justice Department list of sentences handed down related to the Capitol riot.
Featured Fact-check
Of those, she has exceeded prosecutors’ recommended sentences nine times, or in about 24% of cases. In nine additional cases, the sentence she issued closely matched what prosecutors had sought. The remaining 51% of the time, Chutkan’s sentences for Jan. 6 defendants were lighter than what the government had requested.
We found several examples of judges appointed by presidents from both political parties who also exceeded prosecutors’ sentencing requests for Jan. 6 defendants.
-
Prosecutors recommended that Frank Scavo, a Pennsylvania man who pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol Building, be sentenced to 14 days incarceration and $500 restitution. In November 2021, Judge Royce Lamberth (appointed by President Ronald Reagan) sentenced Scavo to 60 days in prison, a $5,000 fine and $500 restitution.
-
The government asked that Russell Peterson, who pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol Building, be sentenced to 14 days incarceration and $500 restitution. In December 2021, Judge Amy Berman Jackson (appointed by President Barack Obama) sentenced Peterson to 30 days incarceration and $500 restitution.
-
Prosecutors requested that James Bonet, a New York man who pleaded guilty to entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, be sentenced to 45 days incarceration, 12 months supervised release and $500 restitution. In March 2022, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (nominated to his current position by President Bill Clinton, and previously appointed to judgeships by presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush) sentenced Bonet to 90 days incarceration followed by a year of supervised release, 200 hours of community service and $500 restitution.
These harsher sentences have not been the norm for Jan. 6 defendants.
It has been more common for judges — including Chutkan — to issue lighter sentences. In one example, the government asked that Nicholas Lattanzi, a Delaware man who pleaded guilty to parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol Building, be sentenced to 30 days incarceration, 36 months probation and $500 in restitution. Instead, Chutkan sentenced Lattanzi to 14 days incarceration, a $500 fine and $500 restitution.
In March, an NPR analysis found that judges have given less prison time than what prosecutors sought in about 66% of Jan. 6 cases. That tracks with June 2022 findings from The Associated Press that in almost 75% of Jan. 6 cases, judges have issued lighter sentences than prosecutors requested, exceeding sentence recommendations only about 10% of the time.
Posobiec said in a tweet that Chutkan "is the only federal judge in Washington, D.C., who has sentenced Jan. 6 defendants to sentences longer than the government had requested."
Chutkan has handed down some of the harshest sentences for Jan. 6 defendants and has exceeded prosecutors recommendations more frequently than other judges. But she’s not alone in exceeding prosecutors’ recommendations. We found several examples of other federal judges who also have issued sentences harsher than prosecutors requested for Jan. 6 defendants.
We rate the claim False.
PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird and Audience Engagement Producer Ellen Hine contributed to this report.
RELATED: Fact-check: Donald Trump’s false and misleading responses after charges over role in Jan. 6 riot
RELATED: Read indictment of Donald Trump in the special counsel’s 2020 election, Jan. 6 investigation
RELATED: Read all of PolitiFact’s coverage on Donald Trump indictments
Our Sources
ABC News, Judges split in growing debate over harshness of punishment for Jan. 6 defendants, Oct. 5, 2021
The Associated Press, In Jan. 6 cases, 1 judge stands out as the toughest punisher, June 12, 2022
The Washington Post, Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is assigned Trump case, Aug. 1, 2023
The Washington Post, Judges have declined U.S.-proposed sentences in two-thirds of Jan. 6 cases so far, Jan. 6, 2022
The Associated Press, Toughest sentence yet for any Capitol rioter: over 5 years, Dec. 17, 2021
NPR, 1,000 people have been charged for the Capitol riot. Here's where their cases stand, March 25, 2023
NPR, The Jan. 6 attack: The cases behind the biggest criminal investigation in U.S. history, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
The United States Attorney’s Office, Capitol Breach Cases - Sentences handed down in Capitol Breach cases, July 24, 2023
The United States Attorney’s Office, SCAVO, Frank J., accessed Aug. 1, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. Frank J. Scavo judgment, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. Russell J. Peterson Sentencing Hearing transcript, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. Russell J. Peterson Government Sentencing Memorandum, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
The United States Attorney’s Office, PETERSON, Russell James, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. William Tryon Government Sentencing Memorandum, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. William Tryon judgment, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
The United States Attorney’s Office, TRYON, William, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
The United States Attorney’s Office, BONET, James, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
George Washington University Program on Extremism, U.S. v. James Bonet Government’s Sentencing Memorandum, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
United States District Court, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
Ballotpedia, Amy B. Jackson, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
Court Listener, United States v. PERT Transcript — Document #64, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
United States District Court, Senior Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, accessed Aug. 2, 2023
Court Listener, United States v. MARTINEZ (1:23-cr-00039), accessed Aug. 2, 2023
Court Listener, Tanya Sue Chutkan (District of Columbia), accessed Aug. 2, 2023
The Wall Street Journal, Judge Assigned to Trump Federal Case HasBeen Tough on Jan. 6 Rioters, Aug. 2, 2023
The Associated Press, Federal judge refuses Trump request to block Jan. 6 records, Nov. 10, 2021
The Washington Post, Trump White House records can be turned over to House Jan. 6 investigative committee, judge rules, Nov. 9, 2021
Court Listener, United States v. LATTANZI Sentencing Memorandum — Document #32, Dec. 2, 2022
Court Listener, United States v. LATTANZI Judgment — Document #34, Dec. 19, 2022
Court Listener, United States v. MAZZOCCO Transcript — Document #32, Oct. 4, 2021
Law & Crime, Former Texas Jailer and Three Percenters Member Pleads Guilty to Jan. 6 Misdemeanor, June 10, 2022
Browse the Truth-O-Meter
More by Madison Czopek
No, Tanya Chutkan is not only D.C. judge to give harsher Jan. 6 sentences than government requested
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.