Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

President Joe Biden speaks about the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions he was imposing on Russia on Feb. 24, 2022, at the White House. (AP) President Joe Biden speaks about the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions he was imposing on Russia on Feb. 24, 2022, at the White House. (AP)

President Joe Biden speaks about the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the sanctions he was imposing on Russia on Feb. 24, 2022, at the White House. (AP)

Tom Kertscher
By Tom Kertscher March 4, 2022

Fact-checking whether Biden’s Russia sanctions over Ukraine didn’t start for 30 days, had loopholes

If Your Time is short

  • Some of the U.S. sanctions against Russia took immediate effect, while some were phased in over 30 days. 

  • The energy sector was largely spared, but banks were targeted directly.

In ads for their 2022 campaigns, some Republicans are attacking President Joe Biden’s sanctions on Russia as too slow and too weak.

One ad is in the race for an open Senate seat in Ohio, which could help determine which party controls the Senate.

"Biden's sanctions are riddled with loopholes and don't even start for 30 days," investment banker Mike Gibbons said in his ad on Facebook and Instagram. "They have carve outs for the energy and financial sectors."

The claim is a mixed bag: Some of the sanctions took immediate effect, some were phased in over 30 days. The energy sector was largely spared, but banks were targeted directly.

What the ad cites

Russia invaded Ukraine Feb. 24, but the United States began imposing sanctions two days earlier, in response to Russia’s deployment of troops into two pro-Russian regions of eastern Ukraine. 

The Feb. 22 sanctions focused on two major Russian state-owned financial institutions, imposed restrictions on Russian sovereign debt and sanctioned five "Kremlin-connected elites," according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

The Feb. 24 sanctions, according to a Treasury Department news release, targeted "all of Russia’s largest financial institutions and the ability of state-owned and private entities to raise capital — and further bars Russia from the global financial system."

Gibbons’ ad cited that news release.

In all, between Feb. 22 and March 3, the U.S. imposed 148 sanctions on Russia, according to a running list produced by CORRECTIV, a nonprofit investigative newsroom in Germany.

The timing

In announcing the Feb. 24 sanctions, Biden said some effects were immediate, but he also alluded to 30 days in terms of assessing their effects.

"We’ve cut off Russia’s largest bank — a bank that holds more than one-third of Russia’s banking assets by itself — cut it off from the U.S. financial system," Biden said.

He added: "The sanctions we imposed exceed anything that’s ever been done. The sanctions we imposed have generated two-thirds of the world joining us. They are profound sanctions.  Let’s have a conversation in another month or so to see if they’re working." 

Navin Bapat, a professor of peace and war in political science at the University of North Carolina, said the Feb. 24 sanctions provided for a period of 30 days to allow U.S. financial institutions to wind down their transactions. 

But the Feb. 22 sanctions took effect more quickly. They prohibited U.S. institutions from participating in purchasing rubles or any other assets from Russian financial institutions after March 1, Bapat said. 

Featured Fact-check

Gibbons’ campaign cited clauses in the sanctions that allow exceptions for certain financial transactions, including some related to the energy industry.

The carve outs

The Biden administration, facing the possibility that energy sanctions could lead to higher gas prices in the United States and energy prices abroad, has acknowledged that the energy sector was not a major target.

Daleep Singh, a deputy national security advisor and deputy director of the National Economic Council, said at a news conference on the Feb. 24 sanctions: 

"To be clear: Our sanctions are not designed to cause any disruption to the current flow of energy from Russia to the world.  We’ve carved out energy payments on a time-bound basis to allow for an orderly transition of these flows away from sanctioned institutions, and we’ve provided other licenses to provide for an orderly winddown of business."

Republican and Democratic lawmakers have moved to stop the U.S. from importing oil from Russia.

Alan Cole, a former economist with Congress’ Joint Economic Committee and former adviser to U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, wrote in an article cited by Gibbons’ campaign that while the sanctions are "an impressive effort overall, the sanctions also have a glaring weakness: They largely spare Russia’s all-important energy sector, the backbone of its entire economy, and its agricultural center — the country is a major wheat exporter."

Russia expert Harley Balzer, an emeritus professor of government and international affairs at Georgetown University, told PolitiFact that Biden "is endeavoring to balance punishing Russia and preventing serious damage in Europe from rising energy prices and threatened supplies."

"The financial sanctions are causing havoc on the Russian stock market, causing the market cap of major Russian firms to drop more than 90% on foreign exchanges and clobbering the ruble," he added. 

"Freezing the Russian Central Bank assets abroad reduced their reserves from $600 billion to $300 billion. They are spending $5 billion to $10 billion per day to keep the ruble from depreciating even more. Cronies' assets are being confiscated at an increasing pace. All of that has far more immediate impact than the oil and gas sanctions."

Other Republicans have run ads similar to Gibbons’. 

Rep. Ted Budd, who is running for the U.S. Senate in North Carolina, and Georgia U.S. House candidate Alan Sims both said the sanctions were "too little, too late"; Jeffrey Sossa-Paquette, who is running for a U.S. House in Massachusetts, said the sanctions "leave out gas and oil." 

Crowded primary contest

The Ohio Senate seat Gibbons wants is open because the incumbent, Republican Rob Portman, is not seeking reelection.

Both the GOP and the Democratic Senate primaries, to be held May 3, are contested. Besides Gibbons, the Republican candidates include Ohio state Sen. Matt Dolan; former Ohio state treasurer Josh Mandel; former Ohio Republican Party chair Jane Timken; and "Hillbilly Elegy" author J.D. Vance. The leading Democratic candidate is U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan. 

Overall, the Ohio race is rated variously by campaign watchers as "lean Republican," as "likely Republican" and "solid Republican." 

Our ruling

Gibbons said Biden's sanctions on Russia "are riddled with loopholes and don't even start for 30 days. They have carve outs for the energy and financial sectors."

Some of the sanctions made a quick impact and some were phased in over 30 days. The energy sector was largely spared, but banks were targeted directly.

We rate the claim Half True.

Our Sources

Facebook, Mike Gibbons "Biden’s sanctions" ad, started running March 1, 2022; active as of March 3, 2022

Treasury Department, news release, Feb. 24, 2022

Treasury Department, "966. What actions did Treasury take in February 2022 related to Russia’s financial services sector pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024?", Feb. 24, 2022

Treasury Department, "974. What Russian financial institutions were blocked in February 2022 pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, and what activities are prohibited as a result?", Feb. 24, 2022

Treasury Department, "975. Is there a wind-down period for transactions involving the Russian financial institutions blocked in February 2022 pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024? What transactions are authorized during the wind-down period?", Feb. 24, 2022

Treasury Department, "976. Can a U.S. financial institution process transactions related to energy where a Russian financial institution sanctioned pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 is involved?", Feb. 24, 2022

Email, Samantha Cotten, senior advisor, finance and communications, Mike Gibbons campaign, March 2, 2022

The White House, "Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki and Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics and Deputy NEC Director Daleep Singh, February 24, 2022," Feb. 24, 2022

The White House, "Remarks by President Biden on Russia’s Unprovoked and Unjustified Attack on Ukraine," Feb. 24, 2022

CORRECTIV, "Live monitoring of all sanctions against Russia," accessed March 2, 2022

Washington Post, "Give the Russia sanctions a month, Biden asks," Feb. 25, 2022

U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Treasury Imposes Immediate Economic Costs in Response to Actions in the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions, Feb. 22, 2022

New York Times, "Biden Hits Russia With Broad Sanctions for Putin’s War in Ukraine," Feb. 24, 2022

The Hill, "Bipartisan calls grow for end to Russian oil imports," March 1, 2022

Slate, "There’s Giant Loophole In Biden’s Sanctions Against Russia," Feb. 25, 2022

Email, Treasury Department spokesperson Morgan Finkelstein, March 3, 2022

Email, Navin Bapat, professor of peace and war in political science and the chair of the Curriculum of Peace, War and Defense at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, March 3, 2022

Email, Harley Balzer, Russia expert and emeritus associate professor of government and international affairs at Georgetown University, March 3, 2022

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Tom Kertscher

Fact-checking whether Biden’s Russia sanctions over Ukraine didn’t start for 30 days, had loopholes

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up